Markdown

Report

The properties Google recommends and almost nobody uses

You almost certainly implement what Google requires, because it is mandatory and the documentation says so plainly. What Google merely recommends is a different matter, and the gap there is much wider than it looks. Of the 314 recommended properties that appear in Google's own usage file, 109 are used by fewer than 100,000 websites. Below is the whole list, feature by feature, with the page each requirement came from and the date that page last changed.

Where the gap is

July 2026 · six ranges, no exact numbersGoogle and the Schema.org community, Schema.org usage statistics dataset. Websites in Google's index.

Retail is the largest single cluster, though not the majority of the gap. Merchant listing, return policy and shipping policy between them account for 40 thinly used properties between them. The same cluster shows up from the opposite direction in the usage file, where 22 terms Schema.org has not yet ratified are already on 100,000 websites or more, mostly merchant returns and product variants. Read together, those two facts say the same thing. Retail markup is moving faster than either Google's recommendations or Schema.org's own approval process.

Recommended properties used by fewer than 100,000 websites, by feature. Usage from July 2026; requirements read from Google on 11 August 2026.
FeatureThinly usedRecommendedShareStatusGoogle pagePage updated
Merchant listing184440.91%Livemerchant-listing
Return policy111764.71%Livereturn-policy
Shipping policy112445.83%Liveshipping-policy
Dataset101952.63%Livedataset
Job posting91275.00%Livejob-posting
Recipe81553.33%Liverecipe
Organization72825.00%Liveorganization
Discussion forum41233.33%Livediscussion-forum
Vacation rental43910.26%Livevacation-rental
Video41040.00%Livevideo
Book3837.50%Livebook
Education Q&A3560.00%Liveeducation-qa
Q&A page31030.00%Liveqapage
Image license metadata2540.00%Liveimage-license-metadata
Local business21711.76%Livelocal-business
Math solvers2366.67%Livemath-solvers
Product snippet2922.22%Liveproduct-snippet
Loyalty program2366.67%Liveloyalty-program
Factcheck1714.29%Phasing outfactcheck
Movie1425.00%Livemovie
Product variants1911.11%Liveproduct-variants
Profile page1911.11%Liveprofile-page

Features Google has retired

Structured data advice ages badly, and a lot of what you will still find online recommends markup for features that no longer exist. FAQ is the one most often got wrong. You will read that it is now restricted to health and government sites. It is not restricted. It is gone, and the markup you add for it does nothing.

Rich result features Google has removed, with the date and Google's own stated reason.
FeatureRemovedWhy, in Google's words
Job trainingDocumentation removed. Tested with a group of site owners and found not useful for the ecosystem at scale.
How-toDocumentation removed. The rich result is no longer shown in search results, on both desktop and mobile devices.
Home activityDocumentation removed. The feature no longer appears in Google Search results.
Sitelinks search boxDocumentation removed and the nositelinkssearchbox rule archived. The feature is no longer available in Google Search results.
Special announcementDocumentation removed. No longer shown in Google Search results.
Course infoDocumentation removed. No longer shown in Google Search results. Distinct from the Course carousel feature, which is still live.
Estimated salaryDocumentation removed. No longer shown in Google Search results.
Learning videoDocumentation removed. No longer shown in Google Search results.
Vehicle listingDocumentation removed. No longer shown in Google Search results.
Practice problemsDocumentation removed. Search Console rich result reporting, the Rich Result Test and the Search appearance filters dropped it in January 2026.
FAQDocumentation removed. Google: "The FAQ rich result feature is no longer shown in Google Search results." Restricted to well-known authoritative government and health websites from 2023-09-14, then withdrawn entirely.

Known limits of this data

  • Google lists enumeration values in the same table column as property names, so a few of the rows below are values rather than properties. EventScheduled on the event page is one. I have not stripped them by hand, and until I do you should read a handful of the entries as approximate.
  • Names with a dot in them, such as offers.price and ListItem.position, are Google notation for a property nested inside another type rather than Schema.org terms in their own right. The usage figure against them is for the last part of the name.

How this is measured

Google documents what each rich result needs on its own page and publishes no machine-readable version of any of it, so I read the requirements out of the markup of those pages on 11 August 2026, covering 33 live features. Every requirement below carries the address it came from and that page's own last-updated date. Google rewrites these pages without announcing it, so a requirement quoted without a date is a claim about a target that has already moved.

I then matched those requirements against Google's usage file for July 2026. Google recommends 339 properties across the live features, and 314 of them appear in the usage file, which is what lets me put an adoption figure against each one. 109 of those, 34.71%, are used by fewer than a hundred thousand websites.

One decision shapes this whole report, and you should weigh it before acting on anything here. I counted only what Google recommends, not what it requires, because required fields are adopted far more widely and the systematic gap is not there. That is not universal. A few features do require a property almost nobody uses, and Book is the clearest case, so a required field is worth checking rather than assuming. But what Google merely suggests is where the broad opportunity sits, and it is also where you should be most careful, because a recommended property is a hint about what Google can use rather than a promise of a rich result. The known limits above apply to the table as well.

You can download the same figures as JSON or CSV and check any number on this page against them.

Usage snapshot July 2026. Requirements read 11 August 2026. Built 12 August 2026.

Analysis © Eduard Dziak, licensed under the Apache License 2.0. Please credit eduarddziak.com with a link. Source data: Google and the Schema.org community, Schema.org usage statistics dataset. Rich result requirements: Google Search Central, licensed CC BY 4.0. Term descriptions: Schema.org, licensed CC BY-SA 3.0, each term linking to its own page.